Cases 41 - 50 of 1,690
Cooks v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Cooks
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department, Smart Buy Auto Sale and Motel 6 Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Basco et al v. Oklahoma City City of
as 5:2023cv01143
Plaintiff:
Connie Basco and Elijah Reeves
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Birmingham City of et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Birmingham City of and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery County of et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County of, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washburn v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield et al
as 5:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Dale Kim Washburn
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, Town of Waukomis, Cory Rink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
