Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Minyard v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Becky Minyard
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Douthit v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Nicklas Douthit
Defendant:
Stacy L Crump and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Schmitt v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2018cv00534
Plaintiff:
Michael Schmitt
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ouandji v. Hedglen et al
as 5:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
Steven Adrien Ouandji
Defendant:
Vincent Hedglen and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rollins et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2014cv00809
Plaintiff:
Brenda Rollins and Danny Rollins
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Holley v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2011cv01390
Plaintiff:
Phillip Holley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Phan et al v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
Quincie Minh-Quyen Phan and Jeffery Miller
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Wilson v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2010cv00339
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of, Oklahoma County of, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hammer et al v. Hammer et al
as 5:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Sam Hammer, Jr and Carolyn Hammer
Defendant:
Sam Hammer, Jr and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mallett v. Taylor et al
as 5:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Mallett
Defendant:
Jeffrey Paul Taylor, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
