Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jones v. St. Anthony Shawnee Hospital Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Tiffanie Jones
Defendant:
St. Anthony Shawnee Hospital Inc doing business as SSM Health St. Anthony Hospital-Shawnee, Brian B. Baker, Karen Barnor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baylor v. Unknown Officers et al
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, Oklahoma City Police Department, Larry Withrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Witherspoon et al v. Ince et al
as 5:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Gwen B Witherspoon
Defendant:
Christopher D Ince, Rachael S Ince, Howard P Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Prater et al
as 5:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
William B Turner
Defendant:
David Prater and Amanda Arnall Couch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Henthorn v. Canadian County of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Canadian County Board of County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
B Christopher Henthorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
