Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Martin v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Martin
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steven Harpe, Mark Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ezell v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Lemaster
as 5:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent:
Warden David Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gage v. Newton et al
as 5:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Denton W Gage
Defendant:
FNU Newton, Alger Flood, Jodi K Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. Levick et al
as 5:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Dick Ray Brewer
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Cynthia Carter and Sheriff of Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Collins et al
as 5:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Roger H Gonzales
Defendant:
Rosalyn Collins, Ulysese Bridges and Terrie Pulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Johnny Wayne Rogers, Jr
Defendant:
Stephens County, Javier Martinez and Matthew Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Levick et al
as 5:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jordan Trevon Williams
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Altus City of and Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
