Cases 1 - 10 of 12
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrell v. Breidenstein et al
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Farrell
Defendant:
FNU Breidenstein, FNU Ferrell, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jean E Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Clark et al
as 5:2021cv00597
Defendant:
Ms. Clark, Ms. Marti and Scott Crow
Plaintiff:
Sheb Jim Ray Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Board of Commission
as 5:2021cv00344
Defendant:
Bryan Boudstun, Dub, Mike Kari and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Brett Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Probation and Community et al
as 5:2018cv01187
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Jackson and Brian Craig Herd
Defendant:
Sara Faye Inight, FNU Society, Marcus Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv01161
Movant:
Ivan Bennett Willis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bennett v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Bryan C Bennett
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Creek County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Miller et al
as 5:2016cv00580
Plaintiff:
Gerald Todd Bennett, Jr
Defendant:
Lennis Miller, Nyles Parton and Benny Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00551
Movant:
Mary Frances Bennett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
