Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, D Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Gabriel et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glen Delane Arnett, Jr
Defendant:
Major Phillip Gabriel, K Hamilton, Lt. J Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castleman v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Castleman
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Steven Harpe, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware-Mustapha v. Zooky
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
K. Zooky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gage v. Newton et al
as 5:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Denton W Gage
Defendant:
FNU Newton, Alger Flood, Jodi K Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrell v. Breidenstein et al
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Farrell
Defendant:
FNU Breidenstein, FNU Ferrell, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yarclay v. Averitt et al
as 5:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manquan Yarclay
Defendant:
L Averitt, Dr L Averitt, Ms K Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mayes v. Dowling et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and K Nikki Kirpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Head v. Zook
as 5:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Charles Head
Respondent:
K Zook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
