Cases 1 - 10 of 304
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Monae Green, Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Defendant:
Williams Hobbs, FNU Walls, FNU Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Sparks and Timothy William Schwanz
Defendant:
FNU Gulickson, FNU Bouche, FNU Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andino v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brianna Andino
Defendant:
William Hobbs and Kevin Buttler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
William D Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delane Williams
Defendant:
Jordan Blake Jones, Jace Gilly, Marcus Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff et al
as 5:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, Terrace Dickerson, FNU Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
