Cases 91 - 100 of 213
Phillips v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00575
Movant:
Jan Michel Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phillips v. Target Stores Inc T-43
as 5:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Rubye Phillips
Defendant:
Target Stores Inc T-43
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hobbs v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2016cv00337
Plaintiff:
James Joel Hobbs
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, Scott Pruitt, Douglas Cressler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurd v. Corley et al
as 5:2016cv00245
Petitioner:
Eric Thomas Hurd
Respondent:
Phillip Corley, Payne County District Attorney and Payne County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eaton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Frances Eaton , Lee Stephens , Marvin Bone and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Corporation , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Willie Ward , Richard Ortiz , Linda Caldwell and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Corporation , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv01256
Plaintiff:
Herbert R Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Phillip Corley, Sarah Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryer v. Conoco Phillips Co et al
as 5:2015cv01218
Plaintiff:
Charles Bryer
Defendant:
Conoco Phillips Co and Phillips 66 Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bugarin-Mathews v. Conoco Phillips Co et al
as 5:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Ciera Bugarin-Mathews
Defendant:
Conoco Phillips Co and Phillips 66 Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
