Cases 121 - 128 of 128
Harrison v. Franklin et al
as 5:2007cv00352
Petitioner:
Joe Jerry Lynn Harrison
Respondent:
Eric Franklin, Oklahoma State of and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2007cv00315
Petitioner:
Tony Allen Castro
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Eric Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foldenaur v. Franklin et al
as 5:2007cv00299
Petitioner:
Robert Jack Foldenaur and Robert Jack Foldenaur
Respondent:
Eric Franklin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brazell v. Franklin et al
as 5:2007cv00285
Petitioner:
Reginald L Brazell
Respondent:
Eric Franklin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Franklin et al
as 5:2007cv00283
Petitioner:
Craig L Taylor
Respondent:
Eric Franklin and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2007cv00222
Petitioner:
Keith L Brown
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Eric Franklin and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barnes v. First Franklin Financial Corporation et al
as 5:2006cv00558
Plaintiff:
Cara S Barnes and Cara S Smith
Defendant:
First Franklin Financial Corporation, Countrywide Home Loans Inc and Doe Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Travis Smith
3Rd Party Defendant:
Wendy Smith and Robert N Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
