Cases 1 - 10 of 387
LANZILOTTI v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv03314
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANTHONY LANZILOTTI, Sr.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
ROSE v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv03222
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEY ANN ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SWEENEY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01912
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DENA JOAN SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TUCKER v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01366
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BULLOCK v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01299
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAYMOND BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FORD v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01229
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
LATASHA N. FORD
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NEWMAN v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv00222
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
DARRYL NEWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARVELO v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00213
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ARVELO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BRIDGEFORD v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2020cv00173
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BRIDGEFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FUENTES v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv06151
Plaintiff:
ANA FUENTES
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
