Cases 81 - 90 of 19,521
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. Sams et al
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA K. VAN ROSSUM
Defendant:
Charles F. Sams, III, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOWNES
as 5:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVAUGHN DOWNES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MANDAL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
SMRITIMAY MANDAL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WATTS v. MUSUNURI et al
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WATTS
Defendant:
SHANKAR MUSUNURI, SANJAY SUBRAMANIAN, JESSICA CRESPO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
