Cases 101 - 110 of 687
LEMASTERS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04797
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEMASTERS, III
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CORPORATION and RENZENBERGER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2016cv04485
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL V. COLON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CAMPBELL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv04484
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GRAY v. US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 2:2016cv02682
Plaintiff:
VERNON V. GRAY
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HOUSER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv02229
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOUSER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SMITH v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02198
Plaintiff:
JERRY SMITH
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and FRITZ-RUMER-COOKE, CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CUMMINGS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
LARRY CUMMINGS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FOX v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
TERRY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv01431
Plaintiff:
KELVALUST TERRY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. COLEMAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA), THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY APPELLATE BORD (OPRAB) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
