General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 52
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
GAMBLER v. TENNIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv01826
Petitioner: MICHAEL ADAM GAMBLER
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NIXON v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2010cv00690
Petitioner: JAMES E. NIXON, SR.
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOWN v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2010cv00648
Petitioner: PEDRO STOWN
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIDDLETON v. TENNIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00548
Petitioner: GREGORY MIDDLETON
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANCHEZ v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2009cv06075
Petitioner: VIRGILIO SANCHEZ
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. TENNIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv05669
Petitioner: HOWARS A. FORD
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANKLIN v. KLOPOTOSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03838
Petitioner: VINCENT FRANKLIN
Respondent: MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KANE v. TENNIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03610
Petitioner: MARK KANE
Respondent: FRANKLIN TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIES v. TENNIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv03461
Petitioner: JAMES WILLIAM DAVIES
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03345
Petitioner: DONNIE HARRIS
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, FRANKLIN TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA PA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?