Cases 1 - 10 of 12
IN RE: HEATH
as 2:2022cv02688
Petitioner:
IN RE: ANTHONY HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ZACHARY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv05616
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
HEATH ZACHARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heath v. Superintendent
as 5:2020cv03722
Petitioner:
Anthony Darrell Heath
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEATH v. GILMORE
as 2:2015cv00880
Petitioner:
YARDEN HEATH
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. FISHER
as 2:2013cv03802
Petitioner:
DARRELL HEATH
Respondent:
JON FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUICK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03698
Petitioner:
G. HEATH QUICK
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00895
Petitioner:
PAUL Q. HEATH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PATRICK F. DUGAN and WARDEN OF HOUSE OF CORRECTION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2008cv01763
Petitioner:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent:
MICHAEL CAHILL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. SMEAL
as 2:2008cv01385
Petitioner:
DARRELL HEATH
Respondent:
PAUL K. SMEAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2007cv04817
Petitioner:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent:
MICHAEL CAHILL, THE UNKNOWN COMPLAINANT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
