General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
MALDONADO v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv02850
Petitioner: ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent: TINA WALKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. WARDEN, SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2017cv05710
Petitioner: MARCO MALDONADO
Respondent: WARDEN, SCI GRATERFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MALDONADO v. FOLINO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01716
Petitioner: ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent: LOUIS FOLINO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07029
Petitioner: DAVID MALDONADO
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. WARDEN, SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2009cv03651
Petitioner: MATVO MALDONADO
Respondent: WARDEN, SCI GRATERFORD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. COLEMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01697
Petitioner: ALEXIS MALDONADO
Respondent: BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv01733
Petitioner: DAVID MALDONADO
Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?