Cases 1 - 10 of 15
RIVERA v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2021cv05546
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIVERA
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04973
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
SECRETRAY JOHN WETZEL, KELLY LONG, MELLISSA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. STOKES et al
as 2:2021cv01222
Defendant:
JENNIFER O. ANDRESS, JOHN WETZEL, DANIEL P. ALVA and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYATT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2019cv05460
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, AGENT GARNER and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
ROY WYATT and DONTE MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDNER v. WETZEL
as 2:2018cv04431
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARDNER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITTINGHAM v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv02907
Plaintiff:
TRACY BRITTINGHAM
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , MOONEY , JOSEPH MATALONI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRADFORD et al v. WETZEL
as 2:2016cv02064
Plaintiff:
LACEY STRADFORD , WILLIAM NETTLES , JESSE STROUD and others
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHIMENTI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 2:2015cv03333
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE CHIMENTI , DANIEL LEYVA and DAVID MALDONADO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) , JOHN WETZEL , PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02684
Plaintiff:
CODY SPRINGS
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOZADA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv02640
Plaintiff:
JASON LOZADA
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
