Disability Insurance Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,041
BELLMON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv04420
Plaintiff: KARA BELLMON
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
GRANT v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04566
Plaintiff: PAUL GRANT
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LOWE-LITTLEJOHN v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04558
Plaintiff: RENEE JOANN LOWE-LITTLEJOHN
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STANKIEWICZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04274
Plaintiff: MICHAEL P. STANKIEWICZ
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03623
Plaintiff: ELENA WILLIAMS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BARR v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04018
Plaintiff: MICHELLE BARR
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ROBINSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03256
Plaintiff: CHARLES ROBINSON
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VILLANUEVA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv03948
Plaintiff: CARLOS VILLANUEVA
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BAKKER, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03915
Plaintiff: ROBERT T. BAKKER, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STRAUSS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03859
Plaintiff: LORI O. STRAUSS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?