Cases 31 - 40 of 216
WARNER v. TRIDENT ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2019cv05876
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARNER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, ORION PORTFOLIO SERVICES II, LLC and TRIDENT ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FERRANDO v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00502
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID FERRANDO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FERRANDO v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC. et al
as 2:2019cv06073
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID FERRANDO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WARNER v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05875
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARNER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WARNER v. NORTHWOOD ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04691
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARNER
Defendant:
NORTHWOOD ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILLIAMS v. PENN CREDIT CORPORATION et al
as 5:2019cv04320
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LAQUANNA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ORTIZ v. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv03271
Plaintiff:
MELINDA ORTIZ
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WARD v. TERRILL OUTSOURCING GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03582
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC and TERRILL OUTSOURCING GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
MELISSA WARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COLON v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv03131
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and JOHN DOES 1-3
Plaintiff:
OVIDIO COLON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
FREY v. FRONTIER UTILITIES NORTHEAST LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02372
Defendant:
JOHN DOE CORPORATION and FRONTIER UTILITIES NORTHEAST LLC
Plaintiff:
JON FREY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
