Cases 11 - 20 of 117
LANZILOTTI v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv03314
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANTHONY LANZILOTTI, Sr.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
CANADY v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05972
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOYD CANADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
STATON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05527
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv04693
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ANN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ARMSTRONG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv02094
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv01856
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
TRINA ELIZABETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HILL, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv05564
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRANK HILL, JR.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv04180
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
LEMARR D. WILLIAMS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
COSTELLO v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv03726
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VINCENT COSTELLO, JR.
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CORLISS v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2018cv01975
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHN CORLISS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
