Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LEWALD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL
as 2:2022cv04448
Plaintiff:
TROY VINCENT LEWALD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL, STEVEN MNUCHIN, CHARLES RETTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BAZIL
as 2:2019cv01659
Defendant:
STEVEN BAZIL
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MULLER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
KENNEDY v. JONES et al
as 5:2018cv03442
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MICHAEL WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEIDNER et al
as 2:2013cv05356
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHELLE T. SEIDNER, ESTATE OF I. STEVEN LEVY, OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
BELEFATTI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2013cv03606
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BELEFATTI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, RANDOLPH A. SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
KOVAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2009cv03079
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. KOVAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
BANDAWAT et al v. UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2008cv03935
Petitioner:
STEVEN J. BANDAWAT and PATRICIA BANDAWAT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
SMITH v. NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv01502
Plaintiff:
STEVEN H. SMITH
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
SMITH v. NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INS. CO. et al
as 2:2007cv01475
Plaintiff:
STEVEN H. SMITH
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INS. CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
