Cases 1 - 10 of 18
KHAN v. QATAR AIRWAYS COMPANY Q.C.S.C.
as 2:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Ainaa Khan and AINNA KHAN
Defendant:
QATAR AIRWAYS Q.C.S.C. and QATAR AIRWAYS COMPANY Q.C.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Akter et al v. Infield et al
as 2:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Sharmin Akter and Asif Khan
Defendant:
Jon Infield, DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
PICOZZI v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv02235
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M.J. PICOZZI
Defendant:
ALLEN SNYDER, KIMBERLY GROEW, STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHAN v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03292
Plaintiff:
KAMRAN KHAN
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP. , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC , ONE WEST BANK, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALDRICH et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv04864
Plaintiff:
MARIE J. ALDRICH , LEONEL R. ALVAREZ , SARAH ARENSMAN and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KHAN v. SAGER et al
as 2:2011cv05596
Plaintiff:
TAMEEM N. KHAN
Defendant:
ADAM J. SAGER, SAGER & SAGER ASSOCIATES, JOSEPH J. SZLAVIK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv00889
Plaintiff:
RAUF KHAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GILL v. KHAN et al
as 2:2011cv00701
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GILL, III
Defendant:
AMID KHAN, M.D. , MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. and MAIN LINE HOSPITALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMARI et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2010cv06509
Plaintiff:
HARRIET AMARI , BIBI KHAN and CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KHAN et al v. QUIN
as 2:2010cv05377
Plaintiff:
AMINUL KHAN and RAFIA KHAN
Defendant:
GUO-XIN QUIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
