Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cody v. Phelps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01461
Petitioner: JONATHAN CODY
Respondent: S. W. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
PHELPS v. OVERMYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02886
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER
Petitioner: IDRIS PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PHELPS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00047
Petitioner: RICHARD PHELPS
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. WEAKNECHT et al
as 5:2012cv04056
Plaintiff: DANIEL S. HARRIS
Defendant: ERIC J. WEAKNECHT, FRANK CATALDI and LATSHA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. WEAKNECHT et al
as 5:2012cv03375
Plaintiff: DANIEL S. HARRIS
Defendant: ERIC J. WEAKNECHT, FRANK CATALDI and LATASHA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. ROZUM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv03501
Petitioner: NATHAN PHELPS
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TRAVIS v. PHELPS et al
as 2:2008cv04183
Petitioner: JOE L. TRAVIS
Respondent: PHELPS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF BEAU BIDEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHES v. WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH et al Featured Case
as 2:2007cv05311
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant: WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH, FRED PHELPS, MARGIE PHELPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?