Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Sloan v. Tech Group Grand Rapids, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02454
Plaintiff:
Adam Sloan
Defendant:
Tech Group Grand Rapids, Inc. doing business as West Contract Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ADAMS v. KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
SHAMAR ADAMS
Defendant:
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant:
RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WARLOW v. BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. et al
as 5:2023cv04794
Plaintiff:
ADAM WARLOW
Defendant:
BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. and JAMES NODEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MURSE v. MURSE
as 5:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
ADAM I. MURSE
Defendant:
MARY L. MURSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FANNING v. JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv04873
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE FANNING, DILLON OWAD, HUNTER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ADAMS v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02781
Plaintiff:
KAREN ADAMS
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SAM v. CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
as 2:2021cv05316
Plaintiff:
ADAM SAM
Defendant:
CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
ADAMS v. QVC, INC.
as 2:2021cv00646
Defendant:
QVC, INC.
Plaintiff:
LANITRA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ADAMS v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00222
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
