Labor Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
THOMAS v. CASMIR CARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2018cv04320
Defendant: CASMIR CARE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: BETTY THOMAS
BETTIS v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv03445
Plaintiff: WILLIAM THOMAS (TOM) BETTIS
Defendant: THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
HENDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03534
Plaintiff: THOMAS HENDERSON , KIM ANDERSON , AKBAR GBAJABIAMILA and others
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHIARINI v. COTT BEVERAGES USA (COTT) et al
as 2:2012cv02542
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CHIARINI
Defendant: COTT BEVERAGES USA (COTT) and BETTY LAIRD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CASTRO v. CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2009cv01192
Plaintiff: BETTY CASTRO
Defendant: CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and THE PFIZER LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
ANDERSON et al v. THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01165
Plaintiff: PHYLLIS ANDERSON, PHYLLIS ANDERSON, PATRICIA A. BREWER and others
Defendant: THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
AAMODT et al v. UNISYS CORPORATION
as 2:2003cv03925
Plaintiff: LUCILLE M. AAMODT, EDITH M. ACKMAN, JAMES H. ADAMSHECK and others
Defendant: UNISYS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?