Cases 11 - 20 of 117
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SMITH et al
as 5:2013cv02481
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
HARDEN E. SMITH, KELLY M. SMITH and KELLY SMITH ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
TALBERT v. HANDFIELD et al
as 2:2013cv01660
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
HANDFIELD, GAINES, DWAYNE CORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv01003
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLDER, JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv07026
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER-BEY v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01364
Plaintiff:
SHARON BAKER-BEY
Defendant:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., WENDY J. JOHNSON, ROBIN M. JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68375
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68378
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54643
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57353
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54681
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E SMITH
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
