Cases 11 - 20 of 37
COUNTY OF BERKS v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 5:2015cv04862
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF BERKS
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEISER v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2015cv03783
Plaintiff:
GEORGE KEISER
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LEWIS v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2014cv01492
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LEWIS
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYES v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv04379
Plaintiff:
MARIA REYES
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY , DAYMARK REALTY ADVISORS, INC. and NNN 1818 MARKET STREET, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MEDLEY v. RIH ACQUISITIONS NJ, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv03626
Plaintiff:
DEANNA J. MEDLEY
Defendant:
RIH ACQUISITIONS NJ, LLC , RIH CASINO RESORTS LLC , RIH PROPCO NJ, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
RIH ACQUISITIONS NJ, LLC , RIH CASINO RESORTS LLC and RIH PROPCO NJ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
U.S. FACILITIES, INC. v. AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv06344
Plaintiff:
U.S. FACILITIES, INC.
Defendant:
AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES and OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MCCAFFREY v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv04790
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCCAFFREY
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PLA v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv04685
Plaintiff:
BRENDA PLA
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERESTES et al v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01302
Plaintiff:
JESSICA KERESTES and CHRISTOPHER KERESTES
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KERESTES and JESSICA KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
