Cases 11 - 20 of 59
BERTRAND-WHATLEY v. DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN'S AFFAIRS
as 2:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
MARIE BERTRAND-WHATLEY
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN'S AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
JANET DOUD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bull v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2020cv04338
Defendant:
CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv05256
Defendant:
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER AT COATESVILLE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE HALL and KAREN HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WILKINSON v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2019cv02489
Respondent:
STEVEN LIEBERMAN and DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Petitioner:
CAROLINE WILKINSON
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 0784
MARSHALL-LEE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 2:2018cv02333
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MARSHALL-LEE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
