Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SHUGART v. PROVIDENT METALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04733
Plaintiff:
Stephan Shugart
Defendant:
PROVIDENT METALS, INC., A-MARK PREVIOUS METALS, INC., JIM BULLION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03676
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. INDIVIDUALLY AND doing business as UPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03670
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
