Cases 11 - 20 of 20
RABA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32054
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. RABA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GRUBB v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30390
Plaintiff:
KERRY M. GRUBB
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VIGIL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52887
Plaintiff:
LENORA P. VIGIL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARONE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38190
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. BARONE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68812
Plaintiff:
JOE S. VIGIL, JOE S. VIGIL, JOE S. VIGIL and others
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68813
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL and others
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VIGIL et al v. AC&S, INC et al
as 2:2009cv67021
Plaintiff:
ADAM J VIGIL, ADAM J VIGIL, SUSSIE VIGIL and others
Defendant:
AC&S, INC, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VIGIL v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv66933
Plaintiff:
SILVERIO VIGIL, SILVERIO VIGIL, SILVERIO VIGIL and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ALERT ONE PROTECTION, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05934
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DALLAS COMEGYS, MICHAEL RICCIARDI and others
Defendant:
ALERT ONE PROTECTION, INC., ANN SCHIOMOS, NICK SCHIOMOS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY v. JENKINTOWN BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2007cv05347
Plaintiff:
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JENKINTOWN BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
