Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 91
R.J. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03285
Plaintiff: R.J. , DANIELLE BROWN , D.R.M. and others
Defendant: PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMONEY ADVISOR, LLC v. CARGLE
as 2:2015cv01926
Plaintiff: EMONEY ADVISOR, LLC
Defendant: CARLA J. CARGLE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JOHNSON v. GREEN et al
as 5:2014cv07240
Plaintiff: CARLA JOHNSON
Defendant: JOSEPH GREEN, PATRICIA ROSENZWEIG and RONALD AHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALL v. SHOVER
as 2:2014cv06661
Plaintiff: ROBIN BALL
Defendant: CARLA SHOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KASE v. AMERIDOSE, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05544
Plaintiff: MARY KASE
Defendant: AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC., MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT SW, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYFIELD et al v. AMERIDOSE, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05546
Plaintiff: ANITA MAYFIELD and DERRICK MAYFIELD, SR.
Defendant: AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC., MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT SW, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03969
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. EVANS et al
as 2:2014cv01728
Plaintiff: DENNIS HOLMES
Defendant: CARLA EVANS , BRIAN EVANS and MARK BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
RUBENSTEIN et al v. EVANS et al
as 2:2013cv06525
Plaintiff: DEAN RUBENSTEIN , HEATHER RUBENSTEIN , NOAH SOKOLOFF and others
Defendant: CARLA EVANS and BRIAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
HIBLER v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as 2:2013cv04932
Plaintiff: CARLA HIBLER
Defendant: ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?