Cases 41 - 50 of 94
GOODWIN v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67057
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ALBERT GOODWIN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODWIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42171
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. GOODWIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOODWIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44210
Plaintiff:
ERNOLD R. GOODWIN, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOODWIN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34868
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE GOODWIN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOODWIN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34869
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W GOODWIN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOODWIN v. WALSH et al
as 2:2011cv03908
Petitioner:
JEFFERY MICAH GOODWIN
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODWIN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66194
Plaintiff:
MYRA M GOODWIN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODWIN v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN et al
as 2:2011cv33597
Plaintiff:
HERMAN GOODWIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN, CENTRAL GULF STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, CHARLES KURZ & COMPANY INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, FOSTER-WHEELER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOODWIN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33598
Plaintiff:
HERMAN GOODWIN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOODWIN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv64130
Plaintiff:
HAROLD N GOODWIN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , A. P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. , A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
