Cases 41 - 50 of 219
KAUFMAN et al v. JETSON ELECTRIC BIKES LLC et al
as 5:2022cv03765
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LEE KAUFMAN and DAMIEN W. KAUFMAN
Defendant:
JETSON ELECTRIC BIKES LLC, WALMART, INC. and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
GIACINI et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 5:2022cv02758
Plaintiff:
BETH GIACINI and JOSEPH GIACINI
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PUKANECZ v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
CRAIG PUKANECZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION and SERENITY PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC
Cross Defendant:
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
Advance Service Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
PUKANECZ v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
CRAIG PUKANECZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION and SERENITY PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MCGILBERRY v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv05050
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCGILBERRY
Defendant:
TARGARET CORPORATION and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKRAM v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04818
Plaintiff:
SIDRA AKRAM
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET, TARGET STORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLESPIE et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv04491
Plaintiff:
VANESSA GILLESPIE and MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
