Cases 61 - 70 of 82
RODGERS v. COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01954
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. RODGERS
Defendant:
COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC., THE GEO GROUP, INC. and ABC COMPANIES I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NGUYEN v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
HOA NGUYEN
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. , TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
DOE et al v. ARMSTRONG
as 2:2018cv01263
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE , RICHARD ROE and ABC COMPANY
Defendant:
MARTIN ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOHIN v. IMPERIAL PARKING (U.S.), LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05606
Plaintiff:
BONNIE LOHIN
Defendant:
IMPERIAL PARKING (U.S.), LLC and ABC COMPANIES I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PARKS v. CREATIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS, LLC. et al
as 2:2017cv02559
Defendant:
AIR-UP, LLC, BIZZARI SERVICES, INC., ABC COMPANIES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
ACE PARKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TOUGOUMA v. WASH INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL
as 2:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
LASSANE TOUGOUMA
Defendant:
WASH INDUSTRIES, INC. , 18TH AVE WASH, LLC , BLUE BELL CAR WASH INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
CARNEY v. NGUYEN et al
as 2:2014cv06976
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARNEY
Defendant:
VINH T. NGUYEN, SISTERS OF DIVINE COMPASSION, ABC COMPANIES, 1 THROUGH 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
