Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 124
CHARLES v. CRAVIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv03242
Plaintiff: KALINARDO VISHANTI CHARLES
Defendant: JOSEPH CRAVIN, GREGORY MALLON, MARRY MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68711
Plaintiff: MAURICE C MANN
Defendant: ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN REFRACTORIES CO , ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANN V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35807
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Plaintiff: ROBERT F. MANN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
MANN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33018
Plaintiff: THOMAS D. MANN and THOMAS D. MANN
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MANN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33017
Plaintiff: RAY H. MANN and RAY H. MANN
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MANN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33016
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MANN and JAMES T. MANN
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06155
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05836
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05647
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?