Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 81 - 90 of 99
HERRON, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74743
Plaintiff: JOHNNY JOE HEATH
Defendant: 3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
HEATH v. SMEAL
as 2:2008cv01531
Petitioner: DARRELL HEATH
Respondent: PAUL K. SMEAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
HEATH v. SMEAL
as 2:2008cv01385
Petitioner: DARRELL HEATH
Respondent: PAUL K. SMEAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71719
Plaintiff: GROVER HEATH
Defendant: ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
WOODROW v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64112
Plaintiff: WOODROW HEATH and WOODROW HEATH
Defendant: ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64113
Plaintiff: YOME LEE HEATH and YOME LEE HEATH
Defendant: ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2007cv04817
Petitioner: DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent: MICHAEL CAHILL, THE UNKNOWN COMPLAINANT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HEATH
as 2:2007cv03013
Petitioner: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent: DARRELL HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN et al
as 2:2007cv66367
Plaintiff: RONALD GENE ALLEN, CATHY ALLEN, BRENDA JOYCE BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv64975
Plaintiff: HARRY F. HEATH, HARRY F. HEATH and HARRY F. HEATH
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?