Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Workman v. Professional Account Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04519
Plaintiff:
Candy Workman
Defendant:
Professional Account Services, Inc. doing business as PASI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC v. R.M. PALMER CO.
as 5:2022cv03716
Plaintiff:
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC
Defendant:
R.M. PALMER CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC v. R.M. PALMER CO.
as 2:2022cv03716
Plaintiff:
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC
Defendant:
R.M. PALMER CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SUNLINE USA LLC v. CAPITAL CANDY
as 2:2022cv01615
Plaintiff:
SUNLINE USA LLC and SUNLINE USA LLC doing business as SUNLINE SUPPLY
Defendant:
CAPITAL CANDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FRANKLIN v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00948
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CANDY FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRACCHIOLLA v. HIRE MY TEAM, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01684
Defendant:
SANTOS GONZALEZ, ADETUNJI THOMAS-QUARCOO, HIRE MY TEAM, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GINO FRACCHIOLLA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
RILEY v. ZITNER CANDY CORP.
as 2:2019cv02677
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RILEY
Defendant:
ZITNER CANDY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PETRETTA et al v. HU et al
as 2:2018cv03720
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA PETRETTA and LEO PETRETTA
Defendant:
XENOS CANDY & GIFTS, KUEI LING HU and XENOS CANDY N GIFTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
