Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
CONLIN & CO., LLC v. TAYLOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02451
Plaintiff: CONLIN & CO., LLC
Defendant: JOEL TAYLOR and J. TAYLOR SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. SOMMERS et al
as 2:2017cv02621
Petitioner: GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Respondent: JACK SOMMERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00128
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TAYLOR
as 2:2012cv02783
Petitioner: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent: JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58305
Plaintiff: ALBERT J TAYLOR
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARR v. PHILADELPHIA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06721
Plaintiff: JOEL CARR
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC., KEREY RUGGIERO and MICHAEL J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49622
Plaintiff: ALTON J TAYLOR
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TAYLOR v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv49381
Plaintiff: ALTON J. TAYLOR
Defendant: ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TAYLOR v. CHOTIN TRANSPORT
as 2:2011cv49380
Plaintiff: ALTON J. TAYLOR
Defendant: CHOTIN TRANSPORT
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TAYLOR v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05798
Plaintiff: DORIS J. TAYLOR
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?