Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WALTS v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. et al
as 5:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
DELANNE WALTS
Defendant:
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C., TERENCE J. MCCABE, MARC S. WEISBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WALLACE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52750
Plaintiff:
LEO L. WALLACE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WALLACE et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv32763
Plaintiff:
JOHN L WALLACE and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WALLACE et al v. FORTY-EIGHT INSULATION, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60175
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE L. WALLACE and LINDA WALLACE
Defendant:
FORTY-EIGHT INSULATION, INC., H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABLITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31438
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. WALLACE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABLITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACRON IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WALLACE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56014
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. WALLACE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WALLACE v. COMMONWEALTH COUNTY OF FRANKLIN et al
as 2:2010cv02875
Petitioner:
MARCUS L. WALLACE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALLACE v. DICK et al
as 2:2010cv02521
Plaintiff:
MARCUS L. WALLACE
Defendant:
MIKE DICK, FRANK KIST, MATTHEW FOGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. PLUM et al
as 2:2010cv02523
Plaintiff:
MARCUS L. WALLACE
Defendant:
DAVID PLUM, MATTHEW FOGAL, MIKE DICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. FEGAN et al
as 2:2010cv02524
Plaintiff:
MARCUS L. WALLACE
Defendant:
COREY FEGAN, GARY CARTER, CHAMBERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
