Cases 1 - 10 of 22
LUSK v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05820
Plaintiff:
LESLEE LUSK
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
SMITH et al V. CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY, ETAL
as 2:2020cv01958
Lead Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SMITH
Plaintiff:
FRANK GIORDANO, DANIEL CHRISTY, REVEREND HERBERT H. LUSK, II and others
Defendant:
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA and CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUSK et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20206
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. LUSK and DEBORAH LUSK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv02416
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MITCHELL
Defendant:
PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., HERBERT H. LUSK, II, ROBERT STRAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HARRISON et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05816
Plaintiff:
LATRESHA HARRISON , CARMEN HAYES , DANNY HENDRIX and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUSK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36289
Plaintiff:
CLAUD C LUSK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LUSK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36290
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. LUSK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LUSK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64542
Plaintiff:
MARGARET LUSK and MARGARET M LUSK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUSK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01274
Plaintiff:
JOHN LUSK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
