Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SPENCE v. RENN et al
as 2:2016cv05710
Petitioner:
LEVAR LEE ANTHONY SPENCE
Respondent:
RICHARD K. RENN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE , SETH F. BORTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. SABOL et al
as 2:2014cv05600
Petitioner:
JEROME FORD
Respondent:
MARY SABOL, YORK COUNTY PRISON and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILBURN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv04491
Petitioner:
RONALD MILBURN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, CHIEF OFFICER IN CHARGE OF STATE PENAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. CLEMMONS et al
as 2:2012cv03702
Plaintiff:
WALTER CLYDE MILLER
Defendant:
CLEMMONS, CARLY MCWILLIAMS, REESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. SABOL et al
as 2:2012cv03694
Petitioner:
WALTER C. MILLER
Respondent:
MARY SABOL, YORK CO. BOARD OF PROBATION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HERNANDEZ v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv03049
Petitioner:
PEDRO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, THOMAS DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARRETT v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv01592
Petitioner:
LEON IVOR BARRETT
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, THOMAS DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HENISE v. SABOL et al
as 2:2008cv05290
Petitioner:
CRAIG HENISE
Respondent:
MARY SABOL and JENNIFER MIOSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWRENCE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01682
Petitioner:
PATRICK ANTHONY LAWRENCE and PATRICK ANTHONY LAWRENCE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MARY SABOL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
