Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Wenerowicz
as 3:2013cv01180
Petitioner:
Andy Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Wenerowicz and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Magallon v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00953
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ernesto Rodriguez-Magallon
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
Gamaliel Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2013cv00107
Petitioner:
Santos Ramos Rodriguez
Respondent:
Michael W. Harlow and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Thomas et al
as 1:2012cv02090
Plaintiff:
Walter Rodriguez
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, Potter, K.T. Kneef and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Castillo v. USA
as 1:2012cv01823
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Elmer Rodriguez-Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Franco v. USA
as 1:2012cv01644
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pedro Luis Rodriguez Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez-Crespo v. Thomas
as 3:2012cv00859
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez-Crespo
Respondent:
Jeffrey Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County et al
as 1:2012cv00830
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Respondent:
Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, Department of Corrections, Regional Jail Albion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Nicholos et al
as 1:2012cv00629
Plaintiff:
Elmer Rodriguez
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nicholos and Aramark Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
