Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Cookus v. Obrine
as 3:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Kellie Cookus
Defendant:
Daniel J. Obrine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roquet v. Kelly et al
as 4:2011cv01763
Plaintiff:
Cheri Roquet
Defendant:
James Kelly, III, Tammie L. Kelly, Harry Mathias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Hess Corporation
as 3:2010cv00894
Plaintiff:
Marci A Kelly
Defendant:
Hess Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fulkroad et al v. Neil et al
as 3:2009cv02004
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fulkroad and Kelly Fulkroad
Defendant:
Mark Neill and Ohio Carrier Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kelly v. Snedeker et al
as 1:2009cv01269
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kelly
Defendant:
Jeffrey Snedeker, Jeffrey Snedeker, Schneider's National Carriers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Kelly et al v. Eckerd Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01834
Plaintiff:
Irene Kelly and Francis Kelly
Defendant:
Eckerd Corporation and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brickford et al v. Babalola
as 1:2007cv02169
Plaintiff:
Kelly Brickford and Warren Brickford
Defendant:
Gbolagade Olanrewaju Babalola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00886
Plaintiff:
Jill Sikkelee, Jill Sikkelee and Jill Sikkelee
Defendant:
Precision Airmotive Corporation, Precision Airmotive LLC, Precision Aerospace Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walsh v. Krantz et al
as 1:2007cv00616
Plaintiff:
Rory M Walsh
Defendant:
Robert Krantz, Robert Krantz, Shari A. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal
Packer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelly Packer
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
