Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Weaver-Bey v. Hufford
as 3:2010cv01429
Petitioner:
Willie Wilson Weaver-Bey
Respondent:
Howard Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hines v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00851
Plaintiff:
Buster Hines
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, James A. Schildt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finney v. Palakovich et al
as 4:2009cv01751
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Finney
Defendant:
John A. Palakovich and George Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Comisac v. White et al
as 1:2009cv01613
Plaintiff:
Christopher Comisac
Defendant:
K.M. White, Tracy Johnson and Nicole Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kapa v. Palakovich, et al
as 1:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Joseph Milton Kapa
Defendant:
John A. Palakovich, Paul K. Smeal, Greenleaf and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carson v. Royer et al
as 3:2008cv02183
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Carson
Defendant:
R. Royer, George Weaver, R. Long and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferrell
as 3:2008cv01572
Plaintiff:
Bruce Ferrell
Defendant:
Jeffery A. Beard, Ph.D., Nicholas Scarff, John A. Polakovich and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Beard et al
as 3:2008cv00765
Plaintiff:
Bienvenido Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey A Beard, Paul K. Smeal, Ronald A. Long and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rainey v. Putman et al
as 3:2007cv01294
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rainey
Defendant:
Chris Putman, Donald Jones, C/O Frantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sassaman v. Mifflin County Correctional Facility Staff
as 3:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Sassaman
Defendant:
Mifflin County Correctional Facility Staff, Zook, Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
