Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Armstrong, Jr. v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Respondent:
Collette Peters and J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armstrong, Jr. v. Carvajal et al
as 3:2021cv01602
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael J. Carvajal, Scott Finley and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZAMICHIELI v. MIHAL et al
as 3:2021cv01246
Plaintiff:
Lamont Zamichieli
Defendant:
Betty Lou Mihal, Trojan, Lt. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Dauphin County Prison
as 1:2020cv01282
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Armstrong
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Briggs et al
as 1:2020cv01170
Respondent:
Warden Gregory Briggs and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Tyrone Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2015cv01520
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Living Soul Chief Asan Manuel Mustafah Fearce W. Yazoo v. Federal Court Defendants et al
as 1:2015cv00446
Petitioner:
Living Soul Chief Asan Manuel Mustafah Fearce W. Yazoo
Respondent:
Federal Court Defendants, State of Pennsylvania Defendants, Philadelphia Municipal Court Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armstrong v. Zickfoose et al
as 1:2013cv02815
Plaintiff:
Michael Armstrong
Defendant:
Donna Zickfoose, Robert Sumners, Ann Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diehl-Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2013cv02302
Petitioner:
Marjorie Diehl-Armstrong
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
