Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Mickens v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Rashan Mickens
Defendant:
Sharon Clark, Heather Haldeman, A.J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
Gina Clark, M. Quinn and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travillion v. Harry et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Superintendent Gina Clark and Sergeant King-Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Sage et al
as 4:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Imhram H. Clarke
Respondent:
W. Sage and Coleth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Berkihiser
as 3:2022cv01561
Petitioner:
Travis Clark
Respondent:
J. Berkihiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. USP-Allenwood et al
as 1:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Warden or Acting Warden USP-Allenwood, Dr. Charles Ackley, Dr. Bushman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark v. Mason et al
as 1:2022cv01469
Petitioner:
Justin Clark
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
