Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Arroyo v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Bryant Arroyo
Defendant:
Thomas S. McGinley, Deputy J. Gibson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00462
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, The District Attorney of the County of Erie and Superintendent Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Bryant K. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Ransom et al
as 3:2019cv02101
Petitioner:
Bryant Johnson
Respondent:
. Kevin Ransom, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Kevin Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv01166
Plaintiff:
Bryant Wilson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryant v. PA State Attorney General
as 1:2017cv01349
Petitioner:
Travis Lamont Bryant
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Ebbert
as 4:2016cv00099
Petitioner:
Ja'Donavan O'Bryant Johnson
Respondent:
Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bryant v. Kaskie et al
as 4:2015cv00820
Plaintiff:
James Bryant
Defendant:
Karen Kaskie and Vincent Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Verbridge et al
as 1:2013cv02773
Plaintiff:
Lamont Bryant
Defendant:
FNU Verbridge, Byunghak Jin and John Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv02006
Petitioner:
Kevin Bryant
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
