Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner: Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent: Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Njos v. Thomas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00766
Petitioner: Scott Njos
Respondent: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robertson v Thomas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00264
Petitioner: Marco Miguel Robertson
Receiver: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv00182
Petitioner: Jeremy Smith
Respondent: Warden Thomas and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Vayda et al
as 4:2013cv02950
Plaintiff: Eric Houston
Defendant: J. Vayda, Klosner, Warden Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Njos v. Thomas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02721
Petitioner: Scott Njos
Respondent: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Shirk et al
as 3:2013cv01486
Plaintiff: Jeremy Smith
Defendant: Shirk, Warden Thomas, USP Lewisburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Lee v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv00184
Petitioner: Darrell Eugene Lee
Respondent: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wolters v. Thomas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01706
Petitioner: Andrew Wolters
Defendant: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hough v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2012cv00554
Petitioner: Jonathan Hough
Respondent: B Bledsoe and Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?