Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Horan v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Patrick Horan
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Robert MacIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv01316
Petitioner:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Kenneth Cameron, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Piskanin v. Martin et al
as 1:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
James B Martin, Kelly L. Banach, Arlen Specter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cameron et al
as 3:2012cv00758
Petitioner:
Quentin Johnson
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steckley v. Cameron et al
as 1:2011cv01417
Petitioner:
Steward Steckley
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron, Superintendent SCI Cresson, The District Attorney of Schuylkill Co., PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkins v. Cameron et al
as 1:2011cv01097
Petitioner:
Allen L Wilkins
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILKINSON v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv01435
Petitioner:
Steven Wilkinson
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkinson v. Cameron et al
as 3:2010cv01315
Petitioner:
Steven Wilkinson
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron, U.S. Attorney General of U.S., Attorney General of Massachusetts Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Niemeyer v. Cameron et al
as 4:2009cv01777
Petitioner:
Russell Niemeyer
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Cameron et al
as 3:2009cv01178
Petitioner:
Michael Douglas Patton
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron, York County District Attorney and Tom Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
