Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Derenick v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01059
Plaintiff:
Christine Derenick
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Catanzaro v. Mattel, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
David Catanzaro
Defendant:
Mattel, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, et al
as 1:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, 50 John/Jane Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kohl v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv02190
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Kohl
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shah v. Harristown Development Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02196
Plaintiff:
Hasu P. Shah
Defendant:
Harristown Development Corporation , Harristown Holding Company, Inc. , Harristown Hotel Development Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
Wagner, Dixon, Donna Zickefiose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
