Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Morrow v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Keen, Weller, State of Franklin County PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Spence et al
as 3:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Spence, Franklin County Jail, K Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Keen et al
as 4:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christian Murray
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Russell R. Rouzer, Michelle Weller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Bey v. Keen et al
as 3:2012cv02283
Petitioner:
David F Kelly Bey
Respondent:
Daniel S. Keen and Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly Bey v. Keen et al
as 3:2012cv02209
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen , Russell Rouzer , Michelle Weller and others
Plaintiff:
David F. Kelly Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Bey v. Keen et al
as 3:2012cv02005
Petitioner:
David F Kelly Bey
Respondent:
Daniel S. Keen and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly Bey v. Keen et al
as 1:2012cv01828
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
Daniel S. Keen and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Keen
as 3:2012cv01366
Petitioner:
Marcus L. Wallace
Respondent:
Daniel Keen and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miles v. Keen et al
as 3:2012cv01022
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E Miles
Respondent:
Daniel S. Keen and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly Bey v. Keen et al
as 1:2012cv00801
Plaintiff:
David F. Kelly Bey
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Michelle Weller and Russell Rouzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
